Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
Încheierea nr. 6945/2012 KI-generiert

Transfer of civil trial jurisdiction between courts: statutory grounds for displacing a designated court of first instance

Geschäftsnummer Încheierea nr. 6945/2012
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Rumänien (RO)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petition for the transfer of jurisdiction, leaving the case with the Turnu-Măgurele Court. The dispute concerned a civil proceeding in which the petitioner sought to have the trial relocated due to a conflict of interest or inability of the local court to handle it, while the respondent parties and the Public Prosecutor opposed the transfer. The court ruled against the petitioner, finding that the request did not meet the statutory requirements for such a procedural remedy. The decision is final and not subject to appeal, reaffirming the original court's competence to adjudicate the matter.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 367 al. 1 lit. a Cod. proc. civ; Transfer of civil trial jurisdiction between courts: statutory grounds for displacing a designated court of first instance: The dispute concerned a civil proceeding in which the petitioner sought to have the trial relocated due to a conflict of interest or inability of the local court to handle it, while the respondent parties and the Public Prosecutor opposed the transfer. The court ruled against the petitioner, finding that the request did not meet the statutory requirements for such a procedural remedy. The decision is final and not subject to appeal, reaffirming the original court's competence to adjudicate the matter.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Zuständigkeitsgründe Zivilrechtsstreitigkeit Kompetenzübertragung E-Justice Obhutsübertragung Rückabtretung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 367 al. 1 lit. a Cod. proc. civ.

Main ground for the dismissal of the transfer of jurisdiction petition as it is not subject to appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

S-a luat în examinare cererea de strămutare formulată de petenta D.G.

La apelul nominal nu au răspuns petenta D.G. și intimații I.P., A.I. și B.C.

Ministerul Public este reprezentat de procuror D.L.

Procedura legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită are termen fixat pentru data de 30 noiembrie 2012.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public, procuror D.L. pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta D.G., prin care solicită strămutarea judecării procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 2060/329/2012 al Judecătoriei Turnu-Măgurele.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 13 noiembrie 2012.

Procesat de GGC - AA