Mootness of jurisdictional transfer request following prior resolution of underlying civil proceedings

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the applicant's request to transfer the jurisdiction of the ongoing civil case, ruling that the request was devoid of legal object because the underlying dispute had already been resolved in March 2012; the applicant prevailed in no capacity, while the respondent authorities were protected from the transfer due to the mootness of the procedural request. The dispute concerned a procedural motion to transfer a civil case pending before the Court of Appeal to another competent court, a mechanism intended to ensure impartiality or resolve jurisdictional conflicts, but the material fact that the primary proceedings had already concluded rendered the transfer inapplicable. The decisive legal basis was the doctrine of procedural mootness, where a request to alter jurisdiction loses its legal efficacy and is dismissed as remaining without object when the subject matter of the litigation has been finally adjudicated or extinguished in the original instance.