Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
Încheierea nr. 1485/2012 KI-generiert

Petition for change of venue dismissed where underlying civil cases were already resolved or suspended

Geschäftsnummer Încheierea nr. 1485/2012
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Rumänien (RO)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the applicant's petition for a change of venue, resulting in the rejection of the request and no further judicial orders to be issued, as the matter was decided without appellate recourse. The dispute concerned a procedural request by a party to transfer the trial of two civil cases from the Galați Court of Appeal, based on a claim regarding the handling of these dockets. The court's decision relied on the finding that the procedural requirements were met but the substantive grounds for the change of venue were not satisfied, effectively upholding the jurisdiction of the lower court for these matters.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

art. 242 alin. (1) pct. 2 C. proc. civ; Petition for change of venue dismissed where underlying civil cases were already resolved or suspended: The dispute concerned a procedural request by a party to transfer the trial of two civil cases from the Galați Court of Appeal, based on a claim regarding the handling of these dockets. The court's decision relied on the finding that the procedural requirements were met but the substantive grounds for the change of venue were not satisfied, effectively upholding the jurisdiction of the lower court for these matters.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Zuständigkeitsgründe Zivilrechtsstreitigkeit verfahrensrechtliche Fragen formelle Verfahrenseinstellung Praxisänderung materielle Voraussetzungen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 242 alin. (1) pct. 2 C. proc. civ.

Cited as the procedural basis explaining the status of one of the cases (suspension), which the court relied upon to determine the fate of the change of venue request in the dispositive.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Cererea de strămutare este legal timbrată.

Se referă de magistratul-asistent asupra faptului că potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 877/44/2011 a fost soluționat la data de 18 ianuarie 2012, iar Dosarul nr. 2390/91/2011 a cărui strămutare se solicită a fost suspendat în temeiul art. 242 alin. (1) pct. 2 C. proc. civ. la data de 31 ianuarie 2012.

Procurorul solicită respingerea pentru motivele prezentate verbal.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta M.F. privind strămutarea judecății proceselor civile ce formează obiect al Dosarelor nr. 877/44/2011 și nr. 2390/91/2011 aflate pe rolul Curții de Apel Galați.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 02 martie 2012.

Procesat de GGC - NN