Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ICCJ_86888 KI-generiert

Transitional penalty recalculation for final convictions barred by res judicata

Geschäftsnummer ICCJ_86888
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Rumänien (RO)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, ruling on a preliminary question referred by the Bucharest Court of Appeal, admitted the referral and held that the provisions of Article 22(4)(b) of Law No. 187/2012, implementing the new Criminal Code (with reference to Article 129(2)(b) of that Code), are not applicable to offenses finally decided as of 1 February 2014. The ruling, binding under Article 477(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, resolves a interpretative conflict over whether the transitional law on the recalculation of the maximum penalty for multiple offenses could be applied retroactively to already-final judgments. The Court reasoned that the transitional provision could not alter final judgments, thereby prevailing the principle of res judicata and the non-retroactivity of criminal law as applied to settled cases.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Transitional penalty recalculation for final convictions barred by res judicata: 187/2012, implementing the new Criminal Code (with reference to Article 129(2)(b) of that Code), are not applicable to offenses finally decided as of 1 February 2014. The ruling, binding under Article 477(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, resolves a interpretative conflict over whether the transitional law on the recalculation of the maximum penalty for multiple offenses could be applied retroactively to already-final judgments. The Court reasoned that the transitional provision could not alter final judgments, thereby prevailing the principle of res judicata and the non-retroactivity of criminal law as applied to settled cases.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
strafrechtliche Sanktion Rechtskraft Übergangsvorschriften Übergangsjustiz rückwirkende Kraft des Gesetzes Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung
KI-generiert
ICCJ_86922
Exclusion of transitional minor-offense sentencing rules for final pre-2014 judgments
Decizia nr. 1237/2014
Post-conviction application of a more favorable penal law: exclusion of guilty plea reductions from the statutory maximum recalculation under Article 6
Decizia nr. 2411/2014
Recalculation of resultant criminal sentence under new Penal Code limits due to application of more favorable law post-conviction
Decizia nr. 556/2016
Recalculation of aggregated criminal sentences following reduction of a component penalty by application of more favorable criminal law
ICCJ_86835
Final convictions re-sentenced under new Criminal Code with two-stage penalty comparison; appeal for precedent-setting ruling admitted, mechanism established.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept în materie penală

Minuta deciziei nr.4 Dosar nr. 4/1/2014/HP/P

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel București Secţia I Penală prin încheierea din data de 20 februarie 2014, în dosarul nr. 200/93/2014, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea de principiu a problemei de drept vizând aplicarea dispozițiilor art.22 alin. (4) lit. b) din Legea nr. 187 din 24 octombrie 2012 pentru punerea în aplicare a Legii nr. 286/2009 privind Codul penal cu referire la art. 129 alin. (2) lit. b) din Codul penal în cazul faptelor definitiv judecate la data de 1 februarie 2014 şi stabileşte :

”Prevederile art. 22 alin. (4) lit. b) din Legea nr. 187 din 24 octombrie 2012 pentru punerea în aplicare a Legii nr. 286/2009 privind Codul penal cu referire la art. 129 alin. (2) lit. b) din Codul penal nu sunt aplicabile faptelor definitiv judecate la data de 1 februarie 2014.”

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 12 mai 2014.