Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Încheierea nr. 3999/2012 KI-generiert

Recusal motion to disqualify all Court of Appeal judges but one held inadmissible

Geschäftsnummer Încheierea nr. 3999/2012
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Rumänien (RO)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible a request by the defendant to recuse all judges of the Court of Appeal Craiova except one named magistrate, ruling irrevocably against the defendant. The request, referred by the Court of Appeal, sought the judges’ recusal. The Court applied Article 28(2) of the applicable procedural code, which prohibits recusing all judges of a court or of one of its sections, making the application inadmissible.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

art. 28 alin. (2; Recusal motion to disqualify all Court of Appeal judges but one held inadmissible: The request, referred by the Court of Appeal, sought the judges’ recusal. The Court applied Article 28(2) of the applicable procedural code, which prohibits recusing all judges of a court or of one of its sections, making the application inadmissible.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Ausstandsbegehren Richter/Staatsanwalt Trennungsklage richterliche Unparteilichkeit E-Justice Ausstandsverfahren

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
art. 28 alin. (2
Potrivit dispozițiilor art. 28 alin. (2) „Nu se pot recuza toți judecătorii unei instanțe sau ai unei secții a acesteia”.
KI-generiert
Decizia nr. 3258/2004
Recusal of entire court inadmissible for lack of per-judge grounds; appeal dismissed.
Decizia nr. 386/2006
Inadmissibility of separate appeal against decision on recusal of judges
Decizia nr. 1817/2005
Inadmissibility of appeal against final rejection of recusal after abolition of appeal provision
Decizia nr. 817/2003
Recusal of entire trial court: inadmissibility of separate appeal against rejection of recusal request
Decizia nr. 2184/2013
Recusal of all judges deemed inadmissible; jurisdiction declined to appeal court

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 28 alin. (2)

Basis for rejecting the recusal request as inadmissible because not all judges of a court or section can be recused.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Deliberând asupra cererii de față, constată următoarele:

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar constată următoarele.

Cu adresa nr. 1032/101/2011, Curtea de Apel Craiova a trimis spre soluționare cererea de recuzare formulată de pârâta SC P.S. SRL prin care se solicită recuzarea judecătorilor Curții de Apel Craiova, cu excepția magistrat E.M.

Potrivit dispozițiilor art. 28 alin. (2) „Nu se pot recuza toți judecătorii unei instanțe sau ai unei secții a acesteia”.

Așa fiind, cererea de recuzare va fi respinsă ca inadmisibilă.

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge ca inadmisibilă cererea de recuzare formulată de pârâta SC P.S. SRL.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 31 mai 2012.