Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
705/2014 KI-generiert

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for non-finality and illegitimacy regarding administrative decisions.

Geschäftsnummer 705/2014
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Portugal (PT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal filed by RIPAR against two administrative decisions from the Central Administrative Court of Norte. The court noted the appeal was inadmissible because the challenged decisions were not final and the second question lacked standing under the relevant law. Consequently, the request for constitutional review was rejected without substantive examination.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 70(1)(b) LTC; Art. 72(2) LTC: Appeals against non-final administrative decisions are inadmissible due to lack of finality, and questions of constitutionality are inadmissible if the appellant lacks standing under the specific statutory burden.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
constitutional appeal admissibility non-final decision requirement standing illegitimacy administrative law review LTC constitutional review Klagefrist Rechtzeitigkeit des Ausstandsgesuchs Verfassungsbeschwerde im Ausland

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 70(1)(b) LTC
Art. 72(2) LTC
Art. 3(3) CPC
KI-generiert
290/18
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for non-raise of normative constitutionality question before judgment.
1085/2025
Constitutional court rejects admissibility claim due to failure to exhaust ordinary remedies and insufficient grounds.
324/16
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of unanimity and potential non-consideration of the case object.
653/2025
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses admissibility claim regarding procedural termination of a constitutional appeal.
763/15
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of coincidence between the normative question and the applied criterion.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

ACÓRDÃO Nº 262/2017

Processo n.º 705/2014

2ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Fernando Ventura

(Conselheiro Lino Rodrigues Ribeiro)

Acordam na 2ª secção do Tribunal Constitucional

A autora RIPAR - Associação de Revitalização Integrada de Património em Ambiente Rural interpôs recurso “das decisões proferidas pelo Tribunal Central Administrativo do Norte, nos dias 25.11.2013 e 10.06.2013”, ao abrigo da alínea b) do n.º 1 do artigo 70.º da LTC, com vista à apreciação de duas questões de constitucionalidade.

Perspetivando a eventualidade do recurso não ser conhecido, seja quanto à impugnada decisão do relator no TCAN, por não definitividade, seja quanto à segunda questão de constitucionalidade, por ilegitimidade, face ao ónus imposto pelo n.º 2 do artigo 72.º da LTC, notifique-se a recorrente para, em 10 dias, se pronunciar, querendo (artigo 3.º, n.º 3, do CPC).

Lisboa, 31 de maio de 2017 - Fernando Vaz Ventura - Catarina Sarmento e Castro - Pedro Machete - Lino Rodrigues Ribeiro - Manuel da Costa Andrade