Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
218/97 KI-generiert

Constitutional court rejects pension law interpretation challenge as it does not violate constitutional principles.

Geschäftsnummer 218/97
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Portugal (PT)
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court denied the appeal challenging the constitutionality of Article 1 of Decree-Law 362/78 as interpreted by the Supreme Administrative Court. The appellant, the General Pensions Fund, argued that the interpretation violated constitutional rights, while the respondent contested the validity of the interpretation. The court ruled that the interpretation did not infringe upon constitutional guarantees and thus rejected the claim.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 70(1)(b) of Law 28/82; The Constitutional Court may reject a concrete review of constitutionality when the challenged interpretation of a statutory provision does not violate constitutional principles or rights.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
concrete review of constitutionality pension law interpretation constitutional principles Supreme Administrative Court constitutional rights violation Rentenhäufung Erhöhung der Invalidenrente Einstellung der Rente

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 70(1)(b) of Law 28/82
Art. 1 of Decree-Law 362/78
KI-generiert
445/97
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal confirming previous ruling on Article 1 of Decree-Law 362/78 constitutionality.
676/95
Portuguese Constitutional Court allows pension regulation as valid legislative consequence of tax authorization.
418/97
Constitutional court dismisses appeal upholding pension law constitutionality against administrative agency.
2071/14.3BESNT
Court dismisses pension overpayment appeal, ruling unequal situations do not require equal treatment under equality principle.
TC_19980294
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses appeal regarding Article 8 violation and jurisdictional divergence. The court rejects claims of constitutional incompatibility and confirms established precedent on competence. The decision upholds the law's constitutionality while clarifying the Tribunal's unified stance on international compatibility issues. The court denies the request to know the case, affirming the existing legal framework. The ruling emphasizes that any alleged defects are merely illegal rather than unconstitutional. This outcome reinforces the stability of constitutional jurisprudence regarding social rights and legislative compatibility.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Acórdão 332/98

ACÓRDÃO Nº 332/98

Processo nº 218/97

1ª Secção

Rel. Cons. Tavares da Costa

Acordam na 1ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional

Nos presentes autos de fiscalização concreta de constitucionalidade, vindos do Supremo Tribunal Administrativo, tendo por objecto a questão da constitucionalidade da norma do artigo 1º do Decreto-Lei nº 362/78, de 28 de Novembro, na interpretação acolhida por aquele Tribunal, suscitada ao abrigo da alínea b) do nº 1 do artigo 70º da Lei nº 28/82, de 15 de Novembro, e em que são recorrente a Caixa Geral de Aposentações e recorrido D..., pelas razões constantes do acórdão nº 159/98, ainda inédito, de que se encontra cópia junto aos autos, decide-se negar provimento ao recurso.

Lisboa, 6 de Maio de 1998

Alberto Tavares da Costa

Vítor Nunes de Almeida

Maria Fernanda Palma

Paulo Mota Pinto

Artur Maurício

Maria Helena Brito

José Manuel Cardoso da Costa