Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
673/96 KI-generiert

Portuguese Constitutional Court corrects a clerical error to confirm the lower court's decision on conscientious objection. The court rectifies a manifest error in a previous judgment where the wrong outcome was granted. The decision clarifies that the norm regarding conscientious objection is constitutional and the lower court's ruling stands. The court applies civil procedure rules to fix the factual mistake without re-evaluating the merits. This ensures legal certainty by correcting the record to reflect the true constitutional judgment. The outcome is a partial correction of the procedural record to align with substantive law.

Geschäftsnummer 673/96
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Portugal (PT)
Ausgang Teilweise gutgeheissen (Partially Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Tribunal Constitucional corrected a manifest clerical error in a previous ruling that had erroneously granted the appeal. The material facts showed the lower court's decision on conscientious objection was actually constitutional, but the earlier judgment mistakenly confirmed the appeal. The court applied civil procedure rules to rectify the record, confirming the lower court's original decision was correct. This ensures legal certainty by aligning the official record with the substantive constitutional analysis.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Articles 7162 and 667 of the Civil Procedure Code; The Tribunal Constitucional may correct manifest errors in its own judgments to ensure the record reflects the true constitutional assessment, thereby confirming the lower court's decision when the initial ruling contained a clerical mistake regarding the outcome.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
manifest clerical error rectification of judgment conscientious objection legal certainty civil procedure code constitutional review procedural correction Anfechtbarkeit des Rückweisungsentscheids

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Articles 7162 and 667 of the Civil Procedure Code
Article 69 of the Constitutional Court Law

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
Acórdão nº 1218/96, de 4 de Dezembro de 1996
No Acórdão nº 1218/96, de 4 de Dezembro de 1996, proferido nos presentes autos vindos do Supremo Tribunal Administrativo em que é recorrente A.
Acórdão nº 681/95
KI-generiert
475/94
Portuguese Constitutional Court upholds conscientious objection law as constitutional and grants relief to the prosecution.
193/96
Portuguese Constitutional Court upholds conscientious objection law requiring explicit availability declaration for alternative service.
704/96
Constitutional court upholds conscientious objection law provision against challenge by objector commission.
41/96
Portuguese Constitutional Court upholds conscientious objection law requiring explicit declaration for civic service. The court rejects the challenge to the statutory requirement for an explicit statement of availability. The decision confirms the constitutionality of the specific clause demanding an express declaration. The ruling affirms the existing precedent established in a previous full court session. The court denies the appeal based on the established legal interpretation of the statute. The judgment maintains the requirement for explicit availability for alternative service. The outcome validates the legislative framework for conscientious objection procedures. The decision reinforces the procedural necessity of written declarations. The court concludes that the norm does not violate constitutional principles.
125/95
Constitutional court upholds conscientious objection law, rejecting public prosecution's challenge to its validity.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Acórdão 82/97

ACÓRDÃO Nº 82/97

Processo nº 673/96

1ª Secção

Relatora: Conselheira Maria Fernanda Palma

Acordam na lá Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

No Acórdão nº 1218/96, de 4 de Dezembro de 1996, proferido nos presentes autos vindos do Supremo Tribunal Administrativo em que é recorrente A. e recorrida a Comissão Nacional de Objecção de Consciência, verifica-se que, por manifesto lapso, se concedeu provimento ao recurso, tendo-se revogado a decisão recorrida.

Porém, como resulta da exposição prévia de fls. 57, do Acórdão nº 681/95 e do próprio Acórdão nº 1218/96 (que decide pela não inconstitucionalidade da norma sindicada), a consequência do juízo de constitucionalidade formulado ê o não provimento do recurso, com a inerente confirmação da decisão recorrida, o que apenas não constou do Acórdão por erro material.

Assim sendo e tendo presente o disposto nos artigos 7162 e 667º do Código de Processo Civil, aplicável por força do disposto no artigo 69º da Lei do Tribunal Constitucional, decide-se rectificar o identificado lapso, de modo a ficar a constar que o Tribunal Constitucional, decidindo pela não inconstitucionalidade da norma contida na alínea d) do nº 3 do artigo 18º da Lei nº 7/92, de 12 de Maio, nega provimento ao recurso, confirmando a decisão recorrida.

Lisboa, 5 de Fevereiro de 1997

Maria Fernanda Palma

Maria Assunção Esteves

Vítor Nunes de Almeida

Armindo Ribeiro Mendes

Alberto Tavares da Costa

Antero Monteiro Diniz

Luís Nunes de Almeida