Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
475/96 KI-generiert

Portuguese Constitutional Court upholds criminal law provisions regarding recidivism and prior convictions as constitutional.

Geschäftsnummer 475/96
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Portugal (PT)
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court of Portugal rejected the Public Prosecutor's challenge to specific articles in the Criminal Code concerning recidivism. The court determined that the statutory definitions of prior convictions and the conditions for recidivism do not violate constitutional principles. Consequently, the appeal was granted to reform the lower court's decision, confirming the constitutionality of the challenged norms.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Articles 55, no. 3 of Decree-Law 214/88; Article 55, no. 2 of Decree-Law 214/88: The provisions defining recidivism and prior convictions are constitutional and do not infringe upon fundamental rights or principles.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
criminal recidivism prior convictions constitutional challenge Public Prosecutor appeal Decree-Law 214/88 Revisionsgründe Anfechtung von Verwaltungsverfügungen Anfechtbarkeit des Rückweisungsentscheids

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Article 55, no. 3 of Decree-Law 214/88
Article 55, no. 2 of Decree-Law 214/88
Decree-Law 312/93
KI-generiert
466/96
Portuguese Constitutional Court upholds immigration detention laws against constitutional challenge by Public Prosecutor.
703/96
Portuguese Constitutional Court upholds constitutionality of detention law articles after reviewing prior precedent.
TC_19960945
Constitutional court grants review of Article 55 of the 1988 Law on the Public Prosecutor's Office.
TC_19960808
Portuguese Constitutional Court upholds criminal law provisions regarding judicial review of administrative acts.
TC_19961136
Constitutional Court allows appeal against lower court's declaration of unconstitutionality of specific criminal procedure articles.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Acórdão 811/96

ACÓRDÃO Nº 811/96

Processo nº 475/96

1ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Vítor Nunes de Almeida

Acordam na 1ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

I- RELATÓRIO:

1. - Nos autos à margem identificados, provenientes do Tribunal Judicial de Gondomar, em que é recorrente o Ministério Público, pelos fundamentos constantes do Acórdão nº 778/96, da 21 Secção, de que se junta cópia e que aqui se adoptam,

- decide-se:

a) - não julgar inconstitucionais as normas do artigo 55°, nº 3 do Decreto-Lei nº 214/88, de 17 de Junho, na redacção do Decreto-Lei nº 312/93, de 15 de Setembro e do artigo 55º, nº 2, do Decreto-Lei n° 214/88, de 17 de Junho, na redacção do Decreto-Lei n° 206/91, de 7 de Junho.

b) - e, em consequência, conceder provimento ao recurso, determinando-se a reformulação do despacho recorrido, em conformidade com o agora decidido quanto à questão de constitucionalidade.

Lisboa, 25 de Junho de 1996

Vítor Nunes de Almeida

Armindo Ribeiro Mendes

Antero Monteiro Diniz

Alberto Tavares da Costa

Maria Assunção Esteves

Luís Nunes de Almeida