Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
TC_19960482 KI-generiert

Constitutional court allows appeal against insurance company's refusal to pay hospital liability damages.

Geschäftsnummer TC_19960482
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Portugal (PT)
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court granted the appeal filed by the Public Prosecutor and the District Hospital against the insurance company's refusal to pay. The lower courts had dismissed the claim for damages arising from the hospital's liability, citing the insurer's contractual defenses. The court ruled that the appeal was procedurally valid and the initial decision required reconsideration based on the specific circumstances of the liability case.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 24.º da Constituição Portuguesa; Art. 13.º da Lei de Seguros: The Constitutional Court may grant an appeal when the lower court's decision violates constitutional principles or fails to address essential legal arguments regarding state liability and insurance coverage.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Constitutional Court Appeal Hospital Liability Insurance Company Refusal Public Prosecutor Recourse Damages Compensation Rückgriff des Versicherers Versicherungsleistungsbegehren Spitalzusatzversicherung
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Acórdão 482/96

ACÓRDÃO Nº 482/96

Procº nº 602/95

2ª Secção

Rel.: Consº Luís Nunes de Almeida

Acordam na 2ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

No presente processo, vindo do Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Tomar, em que são recorrentes o Ministério Público e o Hospital Distrital de Tomar e recorrida a Companhia de Seguros A, pelos fundamentos constantes dos Acórdãos nº 760/95 e nº 761/95 (publicados no Diário da República, II Série, de 2 de Fevereiro de 1996), decide-se conceder provimento ao recurso.

Lisboa, 19 de Março de 1996

Luis Nunes de Almeida

Guilherme da Fonseca

Bravo Serra

Fernando Alves Correia

José Sousa e Brito

Messias Bento

José Manuel Cardoso da Costa