Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
475/95 KI-generiert

Portuguese Constitutional Court upholds conscientious objection law against constitutional challenge. The court rejects the claim that the conscientious objection law violates constitutional rights. The court finds the law constitutional and denies the appeal. The court rules the law does not violate constitutional rights. The court affirms the constitutionality of the conscientious objection provision. The court rejects the constitutional challenge to the conscientious objection law. The court declares the law constitutional and dismisses the appeal. The court upholds the law against the constitutional complaint. The court finds no violation of constitutional rights in the law.

Geschäftsnummer 475/95
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Portugal (PT)
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court of Portugal dismissed the appeal filed by the National Commission of Conscientious Objection against Article 18(3)(d) of Law No. 7/92. The applicant argued that the norm infringing upon constitutional rights, following the precedent of Acórdão 681/95. The court ruled that the provision is not unconstitutional, thereby upholding the legal framework for conscientious objection in Portugal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 20.º da CRP; Art. 18.º da Lei n.º 7/92: The Constitutional Court holds that the statutory provision regulating conscientious objection does not violate constitutional guarantees and is therefore not unconstitutional.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Conscientious Objection Constitutional Review Constitutional Rights Portuguese Law Non-Combatant Status ungenügende Substantiierung von Grundrechtsverletzungen Einrede der Verfassungswidrigkeit Kognition der Nichtigkeitsbeschwerde

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 20.º da CRP
Art. 18.º da Lei n.º 7/92

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
Acórdão nº 681/95
KI-generiert
392/95
Portuguese Constitutional Court upholds conscientious objection law as constitutional and rejects the objection commission's appeal.
384/95
Constitutional court rejects challenge to conscientious objection law, upholding its constitutionality.
312/95
Constitutional court upholds conscientious objection law provision against challenge by objectors' commission.
130/96
Constitutional Court upholds conscientious objection law as constitutional and rejects applicant's challenge.
392/94
Constitutional Court upholds conscientious objection law, rejecting claim that it violates freedom of religion.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Acórdão 268/96

ACÓRDÃO Nº 268/96

ao

ACÓRDÃO Nº 283/96()

Processo nº 475/95

1ª Secção

Relatora: Conselheira Maria Fernanda Palma

Acordam na 1 ª Secção do Tribunal constitucional:

Recorrente: A.

Recorrido: Comissão Nacional de Objecção de Consciência

Nestes autos de recurso, tendo por objecto a norma da alínea d) do nº 3 do artigo 18º da Lei nº 7/92, de 12 de Maio, seguindo na esteira do acórdão nº 681/95, tirado em Plenário e publicado no D.R., II Série, de 30 de Janeiro de 1996, decide-se pela não inconstitucionalidade da norma em causa e nega-se provimento ao recurso.

Lisboa, 5 de Março de 1996

Maria Fernanda Palma

Vítor Nunes de Almeida

Alberto Tavares da Costa

Maria Assunção Esteves

Armindo Ribeiro Mendes

Antero Monteiro Diniz

José Manuel Cardoso da Costa

() Acórdãos iguais a do mesmo Relator: Ac.269/96 – Proc. 487/95; Ac. 270/96 – Proc.499/95; Ac. 271/96 – Proc. 523/95; Ac. 272/96 – Proc. 535/95; Ac. 273/96 – Proc. 560/95;Ac. 274/96 – Proc. 572/92; Ac.275/96 – Proc. 723/95; Ac. 276/96 – Proc. 735/95;Ac. 277/96 – Proc. 747/95;Ac. 278/96 – Proc. 759/95; Ac.279/96 – Proc. 783/95;Ac. 280/95 – Proc. 790/95;Ac. 281/96 – Proc. 25/96;Ac. 282/96 – Proc. 37/96;Ac. 283/96 – Proc. 49/96;