Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
42/93 KI-generiert

Constitutional court dismisses appeal as it lacks a new constitutional question not addressed in prior precedent.

Geschäftsnummer 42/93
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Portugal (PT)
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court refused to hear the appeal filed by Caminhos de Ferro Portugueses against a lower court decision. The court determined that the current proceedings did not raise any constitutional issue distinct from one already resolved in a previous ruling by the same section. Consequently, the appeal was not examined, and the appellant was ordered to pay the court costs.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 221.º da CRP; When an appeal does not present a new constitutional question distinct from a precedent, the court decides not to know the case.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
constitutional appeal lack of new question precedent binding court costs non-examination of case unbezahlte Bussen Geldbußen wegen Zuwiderhandlung gegen Verfahrensvorschriften Kostenrückforderung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 221.º da CRP

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
Acórdão nº. 266/92
pelas razões constantes do Acórdão nº. 266/92, publicado no Diário da República - II Série de 23/11/92 (Acórdão desta 2ª.
KI-generiert
719/96
Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of admissibility due to failure to cite specific administrative law provisions.
450/96
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for failing to raise specific constitutional questions regarding search and detention.
TC_19970480
Constitutional court dismisses appeal for non-merits review due to lack of substantive examination.
547/96
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal as it lacks constitutional review jurisdiction over administrative court fact-finding.
276/96
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for non-justiciability as it concerns civil law interpretation, not constitutional review.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Acórdão 597/95

ACÓRDÃO Nº 597/95

Processo nº 42/93

2ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Sousa e Brito

Acordam na 2ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

Nos presentes autos vindos do Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, em que é recorrente Caminhos de Ferro Portugueses, E. P., e recorrida A. pelas razões constantes do Acórdão nº. 266/92, publicado no Diário da República - II Série de 23/11/92 (Acórdão desta 2ª. Secção, de que o ora relator foi também subscritor), não colocando este processo (como a própria recorrente assume a fls. 266/268) qualquer questão não tratada no aresto referido, decide-se não conhecer do recurso e condenar a recorrente nas custas, fixando-se a taxa de justiça em 5 unida­des de conta.

Lisboa, 7 de Novembro de 1995

José de Sousa e Brito

Messias Bento

Bravo Serra

Fernando Alves Correia

Guilherme da Fonseca

Luís Nunes de Almeida