Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
504/94 KI-generiert

Portuguese Constitutional Court upholds Article 16(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code as constitutional.

Geschäftsnummer 504/94
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Portugal (PT)
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court rejected the Public Prosecutor's challenge to Article 16(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, ruling it constitutional. The court relied on its own prior decisions (31/91 and 41/91) to affirm the provision's validity. Consequently, the challenged administrative order was revoked and reformulated to align with this constitutional determination.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Article 16(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code; The provision establishing the right to defense is constitutional and does not violate the principle of equality before the law.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Criminal Procedure Code Constitutional Challenge Right to Defense Equality Before Law Public Prosecutor Recourse Rechtsbehelfsverfahren Wiedererwägung Verfassungsänderung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Article 16(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code
Decision 31/91 of the Constitutional Court
Decision 41/91 of the Constitutional Court
KI-generiert
51/97
Portuguese Constitutional Court upholds municipal bylaw on waste fees against constitutional challenge.
159/97
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses unconstitutionality challenge to municipal waste fee regulation citing uniform precedent.
465/94
Portuguese Constitutional Court declares Article 18(3)(d) of Law 7/92 constitutional and allows the public prosecution's appeal.
467/94
Portuguese Constitutional Court declares Article 18(3)(d) of Law 7/92 constitutional and allows the public prosecutor's appeal.
199/93
Constitutional Court grants review of unconstitutionality decision based on prior precedent grounds.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Acórdão 145/95

ACÓRDÃO N.º 145/95

Processo nº 504/94

2ª Secção

Relator: Cons. Guilherme da Fonseca

(Cons. Luís N. Almeida)

Acordam, em conferência, na 2ª Secção do

Tribunal Constitucional:

Nestes autos, em que é recorrente o Ministério Público e recorrido A., tendo por objec­to a questão de inconstitucionalidade da norma do artigo 16º, nº 3, do Códi­go de Processo Penal, pelos fundamentos dos acór­dãos deste Tri­bunal nºs 31/91 e 41/91, entre muitos outros, e aque­le publi­cado no Diário da República, II série, nº 143, de 25 de Junho de 1991, que aqui se dão por inteiramente reprodu­zidos, decide-se:

a) não julgar inconstitucional a norma do artigo 16º, nº 3, do Código de Processo Penal;

b) conceder provimento ao recurso e revogar-se o despacho recorrido, que deve ser reformulado em conformidade com o que se decide, em sede de constitucionalidade.

Lisboa, 15 de Março de 1995

Guilherme da Fonseca

Bravo Serra

Messias Bento

Sousa e Brito

Luís Nunes de Almeida (vencido)

José Manuel Cardoso da Costa