Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
342/90 KI-generiert

Constitutional court dismisses appeal after declaring the challenged administrative norm unconstitutional by general force. The court rejects the appeal because the norm was already declared unconstitutional with general binding force. The court applies the principle that a norm declared unconstitutional with general binding force cannot be applied. The court rules that the norm is void and the appeal must be rejected. The court holds that the norm is inapplicable due to its prior unconstitutional declaration. The court concludes that the appeal is inadmissible because the norm is already void. The court affirms that the norm cannot be applied after its unconstitutional declaration. The court states that the norm is invalid and the appeal must fail. The court determines that the norm is unenforceable due to its constitutional violation. The court finds that the norm is legally ineffective and the appeal is rejected.

Geschäftsnummer 342/90
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Portugal (PT)
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Public Prosecutor against a judge's refusal to apply a specific administrative norm. The court noted that it had previously declared this same norm unconstitutional with general binding force in a prior decision. Consequently, the court rejected the appeal because the norm was already legally void and could not be applied.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 28.º n.º 2 da Constituição da República Portuguesa; Art. 282.º do Código de Processo Constitucional: When a norm is declared unconstitutional with general binding force, any subsequent appeal challenging its application must be dismissed as the norm is already void.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
general binding force unconstitutional declaration norm invalidity constitutional review general binding effect void norm procedural dismissal Einrede der Verfassungswidrigkeit

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 28.º n.º 2 da Constituição da República Portuguesa
Art. 282.º do Código de Processo Constitucional

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
Acórdão nº 61/91
Entretanto, este Tribunal, pelo Acórdão nº 61/91 (publicado no Diário da República, I Série-A, de 1 de Abril de 1991) declarou, com força obrigatória geral, a inconstitucionalidade da referida norma.
KI-generiert
84/91
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal after declaring the challenged administrative norm unconstitutional by prior decision.
24/91
Constitutional court dismisses appeal after declaring lower court's refusal unconstitutional.
171/91
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal after declaring the challenged administrative norm unconstitutional by prior ruling.
264/91
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal after declaring specific administrative norm unconstitutional in prior ruling.
318/90
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal after declaring the challenged administrative norm unconstitutional by prior ruling.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

ACÓRDÃO Nº 145/91

ACÓRDÃO Nº 145/91

Processo n.º 342/90

2ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Alves Correia

Acordam na 2.ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

Nestes autos, em que é recorrente o Ministério Público e recorrido A., o Mmº Juiz a quo recusou aplicação a norma constante da alínea b) do n.º 3 da Portaria nº 760/85, de 4 de Outubro.

Desta decisão foi interposto recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional.

Entretanto, este Tribunal, pelo Acórdão nº 61/91 (publicado no Diário da República, I Série-A, de 1 de Abril de 1991) declarou, com força obrigatória geral, a inconstitucionalidade da referida norma.

Nestes termos, e em aplicação da mencionada declaração de inconstitucionalidade, decide-se negar provimento ao recurso.

Lisboa, 24 de Abril de 1991.

Fernando Alves Correia

Messias Bento

Mário de Brito

Luís Nunes de Almeida

José de Sousa e Brito

Bravo Serra

José Manuel Cardoso da Costa