I PK 177/09
KI-generiert
Supreme Court allows correction of defendant's name in labor dispute when plaintiff intended to sue the actual employer.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court set aside the Regional Court's dismissal of the plaintiff's request to correct the defendant's name. The plaintiff sued the Mayor instead of the Social Assistance Home, claiming the Mayor lacked legal capacity while the Home was the true employer. The Court ruled that the Regional Court erred by refusing to correct the name, as the plaintiff clearly intended to sue the actual employer despite the procedural mistake.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 467 k.p.c.; Art. 3 k.p.; Art. 31 k.p.; Art. 264 § 1 k.p.: When a plaintiff mistakenly names a non-employer as the defendant in a labor dispute, the court must allow correction of the name to reflect the plaintiff's true intent to sue the actual employer.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
labor dispute
correction of party name
actual employer
procedural error
social assistance home
labor law
plaintiff intent
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 467 k.p.c.
Art. 3 k.p.
Art. 31 k.p.
Art. 264 § 1 k.p.
Art. 264 § 2 k.p.
Art. 265 § 2 k.p.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 467 k.p.c
art. 52 §1 pkt 1 k.p
art. 3 k.p