Academic teacher entitled to salary during justified absence, not social insurance benefits, per Higher Education Law.

The Supreme Court dismissed the university's cassation appeal against the Social Insurance Institution's decision regarding an academic teacher's benefits. The court found that while the teacher was entitled to salary for the first 33 days of justified absence, she had no right to social insurance benefits for the subsequent period. The court rejected the university's argument that comparing different statutes would create a hybrid system, affirming that the Higher Education Law establishes a distinct rule where salary replaces social benefits after the initial period.