I PK 26/09
KI-generiert
Preliminary employment contract breach allows damages for lost profits and specific limitation periods apply.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding a breach of a preliminary employment contract, upholding the lower court's award of damages. The plaintiff argued the defendant failed to hire him based on a promise made in 2003, while the defendant claimed the offer was informal and the contract void. The court ruled that the defendant's refusal to hire constituted a breach, entitling the plaintiff to compensation for both actual losses and lost profits.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 389 k.c.; Art. 390 § 3 k.c.; Art. 291 § 1 k.p.: In cases of breach of a preliminary contract for a future employment agreement, the limitation period is governed by Art. 390 § 3 of the Civil Code, and damages include both actual losses and lost profits.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
preliminary employment contract
breach of contract damages
lost profits compensation
limitation period rules
cassation appeal dismissal
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 389 k.c.
Art. 390 § 3 k.c.
Art. 291 § 1 k.p.
Art. 60 k.c.
Art. 65 k.c.
Art. 3983 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 39813 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 389 k.c
art. 390 § 3 k.c
art. 291 § 1 k.p
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertII CSK 336/07
Supreme Court allows claim against State for breach of contract regarding defective land title transfer.
II PK 108/04
Supreme Court dismissed cassation; employment contract term must be certain and known to parties.
III CK 103/05
Supreme Court allows damages for lost tax deduction due to breach of promised contract.
I PK 117/08
Supreme Court allows partial damages for breach of promised employment contract and work performed.
I PK 356/06
Court dismisses appeal, ruling breach of promised employment contract liability is limited to non-conclusion, not non-performance.
II CSK 274/06
Supreme Court dismisses claim for damages for failed lease agreement due to unproven construction costs.