I UZ 11/08
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismissed lawyer's request to extend deadline for unpaid appeal fee as professional negligence.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's request to restore the deadline for filing a cassation appeal due to an unpaid fee. The lower court rejected the extension, characterizing the failure to pay the basic fee as professional negligence by the lawyer rather than a mistake of law. The court held that professional representatives must meet higher standards of diligence and cannot claim lack of fault for such elementary procedural errors.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 168 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c.; Art. 36 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych: A professional lawyer's failure to pay a required court fee constitutes professional negligence, precluding the restoration of procedural deadlines.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
professional negligence
cassation appeal
court fees
procedural deadline
lawyer duty of care
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 168 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 36 of the Act on Court Costs in Civil Matters
art. 168 § 1 k.p.c
art. 463 § 1 k.p.c
art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c
art. 3986 § 2 k.p.c
art. 3985 § 1 k.p.c
art. 115 k.c
art. 380 k.p.c
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertII UZP 11/06
Supreme Court ruled Art. 1302 § 3 CPC applies to appeals in social insurance cases requiring basic fees.
II UZ 14/06
Supreme Court allows appeal by lawyer for missing basic fee, ruling it falls under 'fixed fee' concept.
III CZP 134/06
Supreme Court rules basic court fee is a fixed fee under Civil Procedure Code for lawyer submissions.
III CZP 109/06
Basic court fee is a fixed fee under CPC Art. 1302 § 3 for professional counsel.
III CZP 6/06
Appeal by lawyer without objection grounds rejected immediately without summons for self-regulatory notification.