II PK 7/08
KI-generiert
Supreme Court allows cassation appeal regarding failure to address non-appealable court rulings in second instance judgment.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court partially allowed the cassation appeal against a second-instance judgment that dismissed a counterclaim. The appellant argued that the lower court ignored specific non-appealable procedural rulings which should have been addressed under Article 380 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court held that while the second-instance judge must address all such grievances, the appellant failed to timely object to the lower court's procedural errors during the trial, thus barring the claim.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 380 k.p.c.; Art. 162 k.p.c.: The second-instance court must address all non-appealable rulings cited by the appellant, but a party cannot successfully claim procedural violations if they did not raise them during the trial session.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
second instance procedure
non-appealable rulings
cassation appeal
procedural violations
timely objection requirement
counterclaim dismissal
Civil Procedure Code
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 378 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 380 k.p.c.
Art. 162 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 378 § 1 k.p.c
art. 100 § 2 pkt 4 k.p
art. 6 k.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 227 k.p.c
art. 266 k.k
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertIII CZP 49/07
Appeal court bound by procedural but not material claims; voidness considered ex officio.
III CZP 55/05
Plaintiff loses appeal right for procedural errors in non-appealable rulings if not raised immediately.
III CKN 55/97
III CZP 62/02
Supreme Court refused to rule on 30-year acquisitive prescription due to premature legal assessment.
I PK 169/05
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling discrimination claims invalid due to procedural errors and temporal gaps in mobbing laws.
II PK 318/06
Supreme Court dismissed cassation appeal regarding return to job, ruling previous position was CEO not environmental manager.
II PK 122/07
Supreme Court allows dismissal of employer's termination due to abuse of right and violation of social coexistence principles.