Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II UK 98/07 KI-generiert

Supreme Court quashes social security fine ruling, requiring proof of fault in non-payment.

Geschäftsnummer II UK 98/07
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court quashed the appellate court's decision imposing an additional fine on a state-owned construction company for unpaid social security contributions. The lower courts had dismissed the fine based on the company's poor financial situation and lack of intent to evade payment. The Supreme Court ruled that the additional fine is a disciplinary sanction requiring proof of the payer's fault, which the second-instance court failed to establish regarding the specific causes of non-payment.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 24 ust. 1 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych; Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.; The imposition of an additional fine for non-payment of social security contributions requires the court to establish the payer's fault in the non-payment, not merely the existence of formal prerequisites.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
social security contributions additional fine fault requirement disciplinary sanction non-payment liability appellate review financial solvency

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 24 ust. 1 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 21 k.p.c.
Art. 316 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 3983 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 39813 k.p.c
art. 3983 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 316 § 1 k.p.c
art. 39815 § 1 k.p.c

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
II UKN 555/97
Supreme Court allows disability pension granted retroactively when insurance conditions met after initial denial decision.
II UK 395/03
Social court dismissed appeal; pension eligibility conditions must be met at the time of the decision.
I UK 152/04
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; medical expert opinion proves claimant remains capable of work.
II UK 403/03
Supreme Court allows appeal, ruling social fund decisions on extra fees require substantive and purposeful judicial review.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext