Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II PK 293/06 KI-generiert

Supreme Court voids appeal proceedings when a co-defendant formally appeals against a judgment not addressed to them.

Geschäftsnummer II PK 293/06
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court declared the appeal proceedings void because the Court of Appeal ruled against a defendant based solely on an appeal filed by a co-defendant. The lower court had issued a final judgment against one entity while ignoring the appeal lodged by another formal co-defendant regarding a different party. The court held that a co-defendant can only appeal their own judgment, making the appeal procedurally inadmissible and the subsequent ruling void.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 370 k.p.c.; Art. 373 k.p.c.; Art. 379 k.p.c.; Art. 398 k.p.c.; Art. 3982 k.p.c.; Art. 386 k.p.c. - An appeal filed by a formal co-defendant against a judgment not addressed to them is inadmissible, rendering the second-instance proceedings void and the resulting judgment ineffective.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
inadmissible appeal formal co-defendant void proceedings final judgment procedural defect

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 370 k.p.c.
Art. 373 k.p.c.
Art. 379 k.p.c.
Art. 398 k.p.c.
Art. 3982 k.p.c.
Art. 386 k.p.c.
art. 231 § 1 k.p
art. 386 §1 k.p.c
art. 363 § 1 k.p
art. 3982 § 2 pkt 2 k.p.c

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
III CZP 34/91 OSNCP 1992 nr 2, poz. 24
III PK 7/04 OSNP 2005 nr 2, poz. 21
III CZP 25/67
III CZP 34/91
III PK 7/04
Supreme Court dissent argues for remand due to lack of specific party claims and unnamed joint participation.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext