Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II UZ 3/07 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismissed appeal against rejection of retrial claim based on newly discovered evidence. Appeal rejected as second instance court properly handled case merits.

Geschäftsnummer II UZ 3/07
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the appellate court's rejection of a retrial request. The appellant argued that a crucial employment certificate was overlooked by the second-instance court despite being newly discovered, while the court held that formal citation of the retrial ground does not guarantee its substantive existence. The decision clarified that a second-instance court ruling on the merits, even by dismissing an appeal, constitutes a judgment on the case's substance, making it the proper venue for retrial proceedings.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 403 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 410 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 405 k.p.c. A retrial claim based on newly discovered evidence is inadmissible if the circumstances do not substantively exist, and a second-instance court ruling on the merits, including dismissal of an appeal, is considered a judgment on the substance of the case.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
retrial proceedings newly discovered evidence second instance court substance of case appellate jurisdiction formal requirements civil procedure code

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 403 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 410 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 405 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 403 § 2 k.p.c
art. 381 k.p.c
art. 405 k.p.c
art. 409 k.p.c
art. 410 § 1 k.p.c

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext