II PK 154/05
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismisses equal pay claim where CEO duties are shared, preventing objective work comparison.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding equal pay and a monetary equivalent for vacation leave. The court found that the plaintiff, as CEO, shared management duties with another executive, meaning his work did not objectively match the defendant's other employees. Consequently, the court ruled that the statutory requirement for equal pay could not be applied because the specific job functions were not identical or repeatable in a way that allowed for fair comparison.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 112 k.p.; Art. 183c k.p.: The principle of equal pay for equal work does not apply when a position involves shared management duties, as this prevents the objective verification of comparable work.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
equal pay principle
shared management duties
objective work comparison
cassation appeal dismissal
labor law standards
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 112 k.p.
Art. 183c k.p.
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
Art. 98 k.p.c.
art. 112 k.p
art. 233 k.p.c
art. 39311 § 2 k.p.c
art. 39312 k.p.c
art. 98 k.p.c