Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I UK 41/05 KI-generiert

Court dismissed early retirement claim because specific work tasks were not listed in the official government annexes.

Geschäftsnummer I UK 41/05
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed Ryszard S.'s appeal against the Social Insurance Institution's refusal of early retirement benefits. The insured claimed he worked in special conditions at a steelworks, but the court found his specific tasks did not match the detailed list of eligible jobs in the Ministry of Internal Affairs' annexes. Consequently, the court ruled that resort orders cannot expand the scope of eligible work beyond the statutory annexes, leading to the dismissal of the claim.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 32 ust. 1, 2 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych; Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.: Work performed in special conditions entitling to early retirement must strictly correspond to the positions listed in the official annexes to the relevant government regulation; resort orders cannot expand this scope.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
early retirement benefits special working conditions government regulation annexes social insurance institution resort order authority statutory interpretation employment status

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 32 ust. 1, 2 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 7 lutego 1983 r. w sprawie wieku emerytalnego pracowników zatrudnionych w szczególnych warunkach lub w szczególnym charakterze
art. 93 ust. 2 Konstytucji
art. 39315 k.p.c

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
I UK 15/04
Supreme Court dismissed pension appeal when employment certificate listed a job not on the official special conditions list.
II UK 337/03
Supreme Court remands pension case to lower court regarding special work conditions verification. The court upheld the legal basis of the ministerial order defining special work conditions. The court clarified that the specific job title matters more than the work performed. The court emphasized the need for comprehensive evidence evaluation in pension disputes. The court ruled that the ministerial order remains valid despite constitutional transition periods. The court stated that the law defines special work conditions, not the order itself. The court noted that the order serves as a list of jobs, not a source of individual rights. The court found that the lower court must verify the actual work performed by the applicant. The court held that the applicant failed to prove special work conditions for early retirement.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext