II UZP 8/05
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismissed legal question as it sought specific case resolution rather than general legal interpretation.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court of Poland refused to answer a legal question submitted by a lower court regarding reimbursement for a medical implant. The applicant had purchased an endoprosthesis out-of-pocket to bypass a long waiting list for a hip replacement procedure. The court ruled that the question was improperly framed because it required the Supreme Court to resolve the specific facts of this case rather than providing a general legal interpretation applicable to future situations.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 390 § 1 k.p.c.; Legal questions submitted to the Supreme Court must be formulated generally and abstractly, without seeking the resolution of a specific case.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
legal question submission
Supreme Court procedure
abstract legal interpretation
specific case resolution
healthcare reimbursement
waiting list bypass
medical implant cost
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertart. 390 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 68 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
art. 2 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
ustawa z dnia 23.01.2003 r. o powszechnym ubezpieczeniu w Narodowym Funduszu Zdrowia
ustawa z dnia 27 sierpnia 2004 r. o świadczeniach opieki zdrowotnej finansowanych ze środków publicznych
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c
art. 2 Konstytucji
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertIII CZP 66/02
II PZP 5/04
K 14/03
Constitutional Court declares National Health Fund Act unconstitutional due to violation of subsidiarity and social dialogue principles.
III CZP 129/91
III CZP 64/02