Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II PZ 20/05 KI-generiert

Appeal filed during lawyer's illness is allowed if illness justified delay and remedy was timely requested.

Geschäftsnummer II PZ 20/05
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court set aside the lower court's dismissal of the appellant's appeal, which had been filed after the deadline due to the lawyer's illness. The appellant argued that the lawyer's sickness prevented timely filing, while the lower court held that the appeal was submitted too late despite the illness. The court ruled that a lawyer's illness justifying a delay cannot be used to the client's detriment if the request for time extension was made promptly after recovery.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 169 § 1 k.p.c.: If a party's failure to perform a procedural act within the time limit is not due to their fault, the court shall restore the time limit upon request; however, the act performed during the fault-causing circumstance cannot be detrimental to the party if the request for restoration was made with due diligence.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
procedural time limit restoration of time lawyer's illness due diligence standard fault in procedure appeal filing civil procedure code

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 169 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 169 § 1 k.p.c
art. 168 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext