Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II UZ 25/05 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses appeal when lawyer submits only an estimated value without calculation method.

Geschäftsnummer II UZ 25/05
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal because the lawyer failed to provide a calculated value for the subject matter of the dispute. Although the client later retracted a previously submitted hypothetical value, the initial submission of an unexplained estimate was deemed insufficient under the Civil Procedure Code. Consequently, the court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible due to the lack of a specific calculation method for the disputed amount.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 3935 k.p.c.; Art. 3933 § 2 k.p.c.: An appeal is inadmissible if the lawyer submits only an estimated value without specifying the method of calculation for the subject matter of the dispute.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
cassation appeal inadmissibility subject matter value calculation method requirement estimated value insufficiency Civil Procedure Code

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 3935 k.p.c.
Art. 3933 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 39814 k.p.c.
Art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 3933 § 2 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c
art. 3921 § 1 k.p.c
art. 22 k.p.c

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext