Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding employment contract obligation from public health facility selection process.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court's decision to reject the plaintiff's claim for an employment contract. The plaintiff, a former assistant, sought damages after being selected via a public competition for a head of department role that was subsequently abolished due to organizational changes. The court held that the selection committee's choice did not constitute a preliminary contract under labor law, and the employer's obligation to hire was limited to the date of the organizational changes. Consequently, the plaintiff's claim for damages covering the entire six-year period was rejected as excessive.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 44a ust. 5 ustawy o zakładach opieki zdrowotnej; art. 389 k.c. w związku z art. 300 k.p.: The selection of a candidate by a competition committee for a specific position does not constitute a preliminary contract or a choice under labor law, and the employer's obligation to conclude an employment contract is limited to the validity of the position prior to organizational changes.