Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I PKN 305/01 KI-generiert

Supreme Court rejects appeal when parties incorrectly declare appeal value, ruling lower court must verify it. The court held that the declared value is not binding for admissibility assessment.

Geschäftsnummer I PKN 305/01
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by employees against a regional court judgment awarding severance pay. The plaintiffs incorrectly declared the appeal value in their cassation petition, which the Supreme Court noted was not binding for admissibility purposes. The court ruled that the second-instance court was obligated to verify the appeal value against the original claim amount and reject the appeal if it exceeded statutory limits, a duty the second-instance court failed to perform.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 393 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 19-24 k.p.c.: The value of the subject of the appeal declared by the appellant in violation of procedural rules is not binding for the assessment of the admissibility of the cassation appeal and must be verified by the second-instance court and the Supreme Court.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
cassation admissibility appeal value declaration procedural verification second instance duty severance pay dispute

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 393 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 19-24 k.p.c.
Art. 3938 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 36 § 1 k.p
art. 381 k.p.c
art. 48 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.c
art. 189 k.p.c
art. 3938 § 1 k.p.c
art. 393 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 383 k.p.c

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext