I PKN 845/00
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismissed appeal for failing to request time restoration within 7 days after losing excuse for delay.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal and cassation regarding a dispute over employment contract termination and compensation. The plaintiffs initially sought correction of work certificates stating they abandoned their jobs, later shifting to damages claims while missing the strict 7-day deadline to request time restoration. The court ruled that filing lawsuits for damages did not constitute a request to restore the deadline, and since the legal excuses for the delay had expired, the time bar applied strictly.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 264 § 2 k.p.; Art. 265 § 2 k.p.: Filing a lawsuit for damages does not constitute a request to restore the time limit for filing an appeal; once the legal excuse for the delay expires, the time limit runs strictly.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
time restoration request
statute of limitations
employment contract termination
civil procedure code
missed deadline
legal excuse expiration
damages claim
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 264 § 2 k.p.
Art. 265 § 2 k.p.
Art. 378 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 4 k.p.c.
Art. 65 § 1 k.p.
Art. 100 k.p.c.
Art. 393 k.p.c.
art. 264 § 2 k.p
art. 378 § 2 k.p.c
art. 386 § 4 k.p.c
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertI PZP 51/77
I PRN 37/78