I PKN 569/98
KI-generiert
Supreme Court allows employee reinstatement claim against new employer despite prior contract termination by old employer.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court quashed the lower court's dismissal of an employee's reinstatement claim against a new employer. The employee argued that the new entity should inherit obligations from the previous employer, even though her contract was terminated before the takeover. The court ruled that the failure to apply the specific takeover statute does not preclude other legal mechanisms for transferring rights and duties between entities.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 231 § 1 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 393 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego: The inapplicability of the specific employee takeover provision does not exclude the legal consequences of the transfer of rights and obligations arising from other legal bases or factual circumstances.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
employee takeover
contract termination
legal succession
reinstatement claim
employer liability
labor law
civil procedure
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 231 § 1 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 393 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 108 § 2 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 52 § 1 pkt 1 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 80 ustawy o łączności
Art. 6 ustawy o komercjalizacji i prywatyzacji przedsiębiorstw państwowych
Art. 9 ustawy o prywatyzacji przedsiębiorstw państwowych
Art. 526 Kodeksu cywilnego
Art. 40 § 2 Kodeksu cywilnego
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertI PKN 296/97
Supreme Court dismissed cassation; termination before takeover excludes employee from new employer's liability under Art. 231 KP.
I PZP 1/94
Employment contract continues after employer's death if business is inherited as a going concern.
W 12/91
Constitutional Court interprets Labor Law transition to preserve appointed employee rights and obligations.
I PZP 16/95
Polish Supreme Court rules state-owned company inherits collective agreement obligations after privatization.
I PZP 56/92
III PZP 4/90