Labor contract intent of one party insufficient to override agreed terms regarding pension severance pay.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against the appellate court's decision to award pension severance pay to the employee. The court found that the appellate court incorrectly relied solely on the employer's unilateral intent rather than the mutual agreement of both parties to determine the contract's content. Consequently, the case was remanded to the appellate court for a new decision on the costs of the cassation proceedings.