Supreme Court dismisses Social Insurance Fund appeal, ruling employment contract type depends on parties' mutual intent, not statutory presumption.

The Supreme Court dismissed the Social Insurance Fund's cassation appeal against a labor court ruling that excluded social insurance contributions for doctors on duty. The Fund argued that the employment relationship was presumed by law, while the hospital contended the agreements were civil service contracts based on mutual intent. The court held that Article 22 § 1 of the Labor Code does not create a legal presumption of an employment contract, leaving the classification to the parties' genuine will.