Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II UKN 183/98 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses appeal for evidence introduced late without prior necessity, upholding Art. 381 KPC application.

Geschäftsnummer II UKN 183/98
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court's refusal to admit new medical evidence presented for the first time in the second instance. The appellant argued that the need for this specific hospital record arose only after the first trial, but the court found the necessity existed earlier when the appellant cited other hospital treatments. Consequently, the court ruled that the lower court correctly applied Article 381 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which limits new evidence to cases where prior necessity was absent.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 381 KPC; Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC: The second instance court may admit evidence introduced for the first time only if the need for it did not exist in the first instance proceedings.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
evidence admissibility second instance procedure late evidence introduction civil procedure code cassation appeal dismissal medical record evidence procedural necessity

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 381 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC
Art. 217 § 1 KPC

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext