II UKN 183/98
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for evidence introduced late without prior necessity, upholding Art. 381 KPC application.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court's refusal to admit new medical evidence presented for the first time in the second instance. The appellant argued that the need for this specific hospital record arose only after the first trial, but the court found the necessity existed earlier when the appellant cited other hospital treatments. Consequently, the court ruled that the lower court correctly applied Article 381 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which limits new evidence to cases where prior necessity was absent.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 381 KPC; Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC: The second instance court may admit evidence introduced for the first time only if the need for it did not exist in the first instance proceedings.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
evidence admissibility
second instance procedure
late evidence introduction
civil procedure code
cassation appeal dismissal
medical record evidence
procedural necessity
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 381 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC
Art. 217 § 1 KPC