Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I PKN 234/98 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismissed cassation where missing evidence citation did not justify overturning a labor court verdict.

Geschäftsnummer I PKN 234/98
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee against a labor court decision terminating his employment. The employee argued that the lower courts failed to cite specific evidence for their factual findings regarding his substitution of a fire extinguisher. The court ruled that such a procedural omission does not automatically constitute grounds for cassation unless it could have materially influenced the case outcome. Since the factual findings were supported by consistent witness testimony and the procedural defect had no impact on the final judgment, the appeal was rejected.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC; Art. 231 KPC; Art. 264 § 2 KP; A failure to cite specific evidence in a judgment does not justify cassation unless the omission could have materially influenced the case outcome.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
labor law cassation procedural omission evidence citation material influence termination of employment labor court verdict witness testimony

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC
Art. 231 KPC
Art. 264 § 2 KP

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext