I PKN 143/98
KI-generiert
Overtime work during employer control without actual labor does not qualify for overtime pay under Labor Code.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court partially overturned the lower court's ruling, quashing the award of 7,666.16 PLN for alleged overtime hours. The court found that while the driver remained under the employer's control, he did not actually perform work during those specific periods. Consequently, the time spent waiting or resting could not be classified as overtime work requiring additional pay. The case was remanded to the appellate court for a new factual determination of actual work hours.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 133 § 1 KP; Art. 134 KP: Time spent under employer control without actual performance of work does not constitute overtime work and is not entitled to overtime remuneration.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
overtime remuneration
employer control
actual work performance
labor code provisions
remittance of judgment
driver duties
overtime calculation
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 133 § 1 KP
Art. 134 KP
Art. 128 KP
Art. 85 KP
Art. 100 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 2 KPC
Art. 463 § 2 KPC
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertI PR 83/75