I PKN 377/97
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismissed cassation; refusal of evidence does not deprive party of defense rights.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a labor dispute judgment. The lower courts rejected the plaintiff's evidence requests regarding bank loans and witness testimony, finding the dismissal of the employment contract justified by her conflictual behavior and failure to follow orders. The court ruled that refusing specific evidence does not violate the right to defense if the disputed facts have already been sufficiently clarified in the proceedings.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 217 § 2 KPC; Art. 379 pkt 5 KPC; The refusal to admit evidence does not deprive a party of the right to defense if the circumstances in dispute have been sufficiently clarified in the proceedings.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
right to defense
admissibility of evidence
labor dispute
dismissal of employment contract
cassation appeal
clarification of facts
procedural fairness
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 217 § 2 KPC
Art. 379 pkt 5 KPC
Art. 393 § 11 KPC
Art. 393 § 12 KPC
Art. 45 KP