II UKN 183/97
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lawyer's non-notification did not affect outcome as client waived presence.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Jerzy C. against a labor accident compensation decision. The appellant's lawyer argued that failing to notify him of the hearing date deprived him of defense rights, yet the client had requested the trial proceed in his absence. The court ruled that since the client waived his presence and the expert opinion was favorable, the procedural error had no impact on the final result.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 379 pkt 5 KPC; Art. 393 1 pkt 1 KPC: Failure to notify a representative of a hearing date does not deprive a party of defense rights if the party requested the trial proceed in their absence and the error did not affect the outcome.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
cassation appeal dismissal
procedural error impact
waiver of presence
labor accident compensation
expert opinion relevance
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 379 pkt 5 KPC
Art. 393 1 pkt 1 KPC
Art. 393 8 KPC
Art. 6 ustawa z dnia 12 czerwca 1975 r. o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych
§ 3 pkt 2 rozporządzenia Ministra Pracy, Płac i Spraw Socjalnych z dnia 17 października 1975 r.
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertII UKN 183/94