Supreme Court allows termination of a named teacher's contract due to persistent organizational changes preventing re-employment after a court order.

The Supreme Court quashed lower court rulings that had dismissed a teacher's claim to return to his former position. The teacher had been unlawfully transferred to a different role without consent, but the school subsequently terminated his contract citing ongoing organizational changes that made his previous role impossible. The court held that the lower courts erred by requiring new circumstances to justify termination, ruling instead that the pre-existing organizational barriers were sufficient grounds to end the employment relationship under the Teachers' Charter.