Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II UKN 77/96 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismissed cassation for lack of grounds, upholding lower court's free evaluation of evidence in disability pension case.

Geschäftsnummer II UKN 77/96
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Grzegorz W. against the Second Instance Court's decision denying his claim for a rural disability pension. The appellant argued that the lower court improperly excluded an additional expert opinion from the Collegium Medicum, violating procedural rules regarding evidence evaluation. The court rejected this claim, ruling that the lower court correctly exercised its freedom of evidence assessment based on the existing medical records and expert opinions which consistently found the applicant capable of light farm work without constant care.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 233 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 12 KPC: The cassation court cannot review the substantive correctness of factual findings made by the lower court, as the lower court retains the freedom of evidence assessment unless a clear violation of procedural rules occurs.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
freedom of evidence assessment disability pension classification cassation admissibility medical expert opinions rural disability pension procedural review limits invalidity group I

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 12 KPC
Art. 393 § 15 KPC
Art. 21 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 24 ust. 4 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext