II UZ 20/96
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for late filing due to misdirected envelope not excusing delay.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal because it was filed late. Although the appellant argued that mailing the envelope to the wrong court excused the delay, the court held that such an error does not justify missing the statutory deadline. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as procedurally inadmissible under the Civil Procedure Code.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 393 § 4 KPC; Art. 393 § 5 KPC: Misdirecting a cassation appeal to the Supreme Court instead of the appellate court does not excuse the failure to file within the prescribed one-month period.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
cassation appeal
statutory deadline
misdirected filing
procedural inadmissibility
Civil Procedure Code
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 393 § 4 KPC
Art. 393 § 5 KPC
Art. 393 § 18 KPC
Art. 393 § 19 KPC