Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II UKN 51/96 KI-generiert

Polish Supreme Court dismisses appeal in social benefit case where disputed value is under 5,000 zlotys. The appeal is inadmissible due to the low monetary value of the claim. The court rules that the appeal is procedurally barred because the financial stake does not meet the statutory threshold for civil appeals.

Geschäftsnummer II UKN 51/96
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Poland rejected the cassation appeal filed by Piotr K. against a social security decision regarding disability pension classification. The applicant argued for a higher disability group and salary recalculation, claiming procedural errors in expert evaluations and missing accounting testimony. The court dismissed the appeal as inadmissible because the monetary value of the disputed claim was below the 5,000 zloty threshold required for civil appeals under the Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 393 § 1 pkt 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego; Art. 393 § 5 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego: In social benefit cases, a cassation appeal is inadmissible if the value of the subject matter is less than five thousand zlotys, regardless of the applicant's claim for higher benefits.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
cassation appeal inadmissibility social benefit value threshold disability pension classification civil procedure code monetary value limitation

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
art. 393 § 1 pkt 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
art. 393 § 5 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
art. 393 § 8 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
art. 22 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext