Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II UZ 14/96 KI-generiert

Supreme Court mandates appeal court to appoint counsel ex officio when personal appeal includes such request within statutory deadline.

Geschäftsnummer II UZ 14/96
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court overturned the Appeal Court's dismissal of Tadeusz T.'s personal appeal, which contained a request for an attorney to be appointed by the court. Although the Appeal Court rejected the appeal citing procedural requirements for legal representation, the Supreme Court found the personal appeal valid because it included a specific request for counsel within the one-month deadline. Consequently, the court ordered the Appeal Court to recognize the request and appoint an attorney rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 393 2 § 1 KPC; Art. 465 § 1 KPC; Art. 117 § 1 KPC: When a party personally files an appeal within the statutory period containing a request for an attorney to be appointed by the court, the court is obligated to process that request and cannot dismiss the appeal solely on the grounds of the party's lack of legal representation.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
personal appeal filing attorney appointment ex officio procedural deadline compliance legal representation requirement appeal dismissal grounds

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 393 2 § 1 KPC
Art. 465 § 1 KPC
Art. 117 § 1 KPC
Art. 117 § 2 KPC
Art. 393 4 KPC
Art. 393 12 KPC

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext