II UKN 24/96
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal for failure to state grounds and justify legal violations under Civil Procedure Code.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal because the applicant failed to specify the grounds for cassation and justify the alleged procedural violations. The applicant challenged a lower court's refusal to grant early retirement based on insufficient work history, arguing factual errors regarding employment at a farm. The court ruled that without specific grounds and a detailed explanation of the legal breach, the appeal cannot be substantively examined and must be rejected as inadmissible.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 393 § 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 12 k.p.c.; A cassation appeal must clearly state its grounds and justify the alleged violation of law or procedure; failure to do so renders the appeal inadmissible and precludes substantive review.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
cassation appeal
inadmissible grounds
Civil Procedure Code
procedural violation
justification requirement
substantive review
dismissal of appeal
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertart. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 5 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 8 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 11 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertC.III 31/37