I PZP 1/95
KI-generiert
Supreme Court refused to rule on a labor law issue because the lower court's legal question was factually misplaced.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court of Poland refused to issue a ruling on a legal question regarding the validity of a workers' council resolution. The lower court had framed the issue as whether the resolution violated specific statutory competencies, but the facts showed the council only exercised opinion-forming powers. The court decided that answering the lower court's specific question would require it to address facts outside the established case file, thereby violating judicial independence and the scope of the review procedure.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 391 k.p.c.; If the legal question presented under Art. 391 of the Civil Procedure Code does not fit within the factual state of the case, the Supreme Court cannot rule on it substantively.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
legal question review
judicial independence
workers' council competencies
opinion forming powers
scope of review
factual state of case
Supreme Court refusal
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 391 k.p.c.
Art. 24 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 25 września 1981 r. o samorządzie załogi przedsiębiorstwa państwowego
Art. 25 ustawy z dnia 25 września 1981 r. o samorządzie załogi przedsiębiorstwa państwowego
art. 391 k.p
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 391 § 2 k.p.c
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertpostanowienie z dnia 29 listopada 1993 r., III AZP 21/93
wyrok z dnia 12 października 1994 r., II UR 8/94
postanowienie z dnia 1 września 1993 r., III CZP 119/93
III CZP 119/93