Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
III ARN 8/94 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismissed extraordinary review; obvious error insufficient for gross violation of law under Art. 417 § 1 k.p.c.

Geschäftsnummer III ARN 8/94
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the Minister of Justice's extraordinary review against the Supreme Administrative Court's decision to reject a building permit application. The applicant argued the lower court's ruling constituted a gross violation of law, while the administration contended the decision was based on equal treatment and procedural correctness. The court ruled that an obvious error alone does not meet the high threshold for a gross violation, as overturning the decision would unjustly privilege one party over another without a clear legal basis.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 417 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 421 § 1 k.p.c.; Even an obvious error in law is insufficient to constitute a gross violation requiring the setting aside of a judgment; only errors producing consequences unacceptable from the perspective of the rule of law qualify as gross violations.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
extraordinary review gross violation of law obvious error principle of equality rule of law administrative procedure building permit

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 417 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 421 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 5 ust. 1 pkt 6 Prawa budowlanego
§ 12 i 13 rozporządzenia Ministra Administracji, Gospodarki Terenowej i Ochrony środowiska z dnia 3 lipca 1980 r.
art. 417 § 1 k.p.c
art. 138 § 1 pkt 2 k.p
art. 421 § 1 k.p.c

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
I SA 367/83
IV SA 129/87
III ARN 18/91
III CRN 265/67
III CRN 314/87

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext