II Ka 1/23
KI-generiert
Criminal appeal dismissed; lower court acquitted defendant, higher court remands for retrial under ne peuis rule.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Court of Appeal dismissed the prosecutor's appeal and remanded the case to the District Court in Łuków for a retrial. The prosecutor argued for a conviction based on procedural errors, but the defendant had been acquitted in the first instance. The court applied the ne peuis rule, prohibiting a second conviction after an acquittal, and ordered the lower court to re-examine the facts without bias.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 454 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 438 § 2 k.p.k.; The principle of ne peuis prohibits a court of appeal from convicting a defendant who was acquitted in the first instance, requiring remand for a new trial.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
ne peuis rule
acquittal
criminal appeal
procedural error
remand for retrial
second conviction ban
court of appeal
Beweislosigkeit
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 454 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 438 § 2 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
art. 454 § 1 k.p.k
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVI Ka 457/21
Court upheld appeal against prosecutor, ordered defense lawyer costs, and shifted prosecutor costs to state.
II Ka 822/23
Criminal appeal dismissed; first-instance sentence upheld due to lack of procedural errors affecting the verdict.
VI Ka 316/23
Appeal court dismisses joint sentence and terminates proceedings due to procedural error requiring new trial.
II Ka 372/21
Appeal dismissed; first-instance conviction upheld due to lack of procedural or substantive errors.
II AKa 49/25
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first instance verdict on facts and sentencing despite expert opinion request denial.