Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Ordinanza — n. 14105/2026 — snpen KI-generiert

Criminal appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to lack of standing or procedural defect under Italian law.

Geschäftsnummer Ordinanza — n. 14105/2026 — snpen
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Italien (IT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Court of Cassazione declared the appeal inadmissible and ordered the appellant to pay procedural costs. The appellant, convicted of the crime in Article 385 of the Penal Code, challenged the Second Instance Court's judgment personally. The court rejected the appeal because the legal grounds for admissibility were not met, resulting in a dismissal of the request.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 385 c.p.; Art. 600 c.p.p.: An appeal is inadmissible if the appellant lacks the requisite standing or fails to comply with mandatory procedural requirements, thereby precluding the review of the merits.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
criminal appeal inadmissibility lack of standing procedural defect Article 385 Penal Code Second Instance judgment Umgehung der Beitragspflicht Unzumutbarkeit des Wegweisungsvollzugs Steuerumgehung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 385 c.p.
Art. 600 c.p.p.
art. 385 c.p
KI-generiert
Ordinanza — n. 14099/2026 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to failure to exhaust prior administrative remedies required by law.
Ordinanza — n. 32967/2025 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal for lack of specific grounds regarding non-punishability due to minor offense.
Ordinanza — n. 26694/2022 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal for genericity regarding home detention breach and lack of generic mitigation application.
Ordinanza — n. 50516/2023 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeals as inadmissible due to lack of specific grounds and improper scope regarding sentencing.
Ordinanza — n. 34098/2024 — snpen
Italian Supreme Court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to manifestly unfounded arguments regarding generic mitigating circumstances.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

O nato a POLLENA TROCCHIA il 14/10/1982 avverso la sentenza del 12/06/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di NAPOLI udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PIETRO SILVESTRI;R.G. n. 30591/2025 CONSIDERATO IN FATTO E IN DIRITTO Visti gli atti, la sentenza impugnata (condanna per il delitto di cui all'art. 385 c.p.); Letto il ricorso, proposto personalmente dall'imputato; Ritenuto il ricorso inammissibile; Ritenuto, pertanto, che l'imputato deve essere condannato al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende; P. Q P.Q.M