Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Ordinanza — n. 12917/2026 — snpen KI-generiert

Criminal appeal dismissed for lack of qualified defense counsel signature under Italian Code of Criminal Procedure.

Geschäftsnummer Ordinanza — n. 12917/2026 — snpen
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Italien (IT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Court of Cassazione declared the appeal inadmissible because it was signed by the interested party rather than a qualified defense attorney. The appellant, Saidi Slim, failed to comply with the requirement that appeals be submitted by a lawyer enrolled in the special register. Consequently, the court ordered the dismissal of the appeal and imposed a fine of three thousand euros on the appellant.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 571, comma 1, and Art. 613, comma 1, of the Code of Criminal Procedure; Art. 610, comma 5-bis, of the Code of Criminal Procedure: An appeal must be signed by a qualified defense attorney; failure to comply renders the appeal inadmissible.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
qualified defense counsel special register requirement inadmissible appeal Code of Criminal Procedure procedural defect legal representation court of cassazione fehlende Legitimation der Staatsanwaltschaft

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 571, comma 1, of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Art. 613, comma 1, of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Art. 610, comma 5-bis, of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Rilevato, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, deplano, a norma dell'art. 610, comma 5-bis, cod.
Law n. 103 of 2017

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
Sez. U, n. 8914 del 21/12/2017
103 del 2017;Sez. U, n. 8914 del 21/12/2017, dep.
KI-generiert
Ordinanza — n. 27550/2022 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal due to failure to file by a registered defense attorney.
Ordinanza — n. 17189/2024 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible because the petition was signed personally by the accused rather than by a registered defense attorney.
Ordinanza — n. 34497/2022 — snpen
Appeal dismissed for lack of counsel signature; appeal must be signed by a registered defense lawyer under criminal procedure code.
Ordinanza — n. 27777/2025 — snpen
Court dismisses appeal as personally presented by defendant, violating mandatory defense attorney signature rule.
Ordinanza — n. 17192/2024 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible because the petition was signed personally by the accused rather than by a qualified defense attorney.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

NCONAudita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere FRANCESCO ALIFFI;RITENUTO IN FATTO E CONSIDERATO IN DIRITTOVisti gli atti.Esaminati il ricorso e l'ordinanza impugnata.1. Rilevato che l'atto di impugnazione è stato proposto personalmentedall'interessato, Saidi Slim, mentre avrebbe dovuto essere sottoscritto dadifensore iscritto nell'albo speciale della Corte di cassazione (artt. 571, comma 1,e 613, comma 1, cod. proc. pen., come modificati dalla legge n. 103 del 2017;Sez. U, n. 8914 del 21/12/2017, dep. 2018, Aiello, Rv. 272010-01).2. Rilevato, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, deplano, a norma dell'art. 610, comma 5-bis, cod. proc. pen. (introdotto dallamedesima legge n. 103 del 2017), con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamentodelle spese processuali e della somma di tremila euro in favore della Cassa delleammende. P.Q.MDichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento dellespese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delleammende.Così deciso, in Roma 26 marzo 2026Il Consigliere estensore Il Presidente