Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Ordinanza — n. 8867/2026 — snpen KI-generiert

Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible because filed personally by defendant without a qualified lawyer.

Geschäftsnummer Ordinanza — n. 8867/2026 — snpen
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Italien (IT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court declared the criminal appeal inadmissible de plano because it was filed personally by the defendant rather than by a qualified lawyer. The defendant, Saho Lamin, argued for the review of the appellate court's decision, but the court noted that Article 613 of the Criminal Procedure Code requires representation by an authorized attorney. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal immediately and ordered the defendant to pay procedural costs and a fine.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 613 c.p.p.; Art. 616 c.p.p.: An appeal in criminal proceedings is inadmissible if filed personally by the accused instead of by a qualified lawyer, resulting in the immediate dismissal of the request.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
criminal appeal inadmissibility personal filing by defendant mandatory legal representation de plano dismissal procedural costs and fine ungenügende Rechtsschrift Recht auf einen Verteidiger formungültige Eingabe

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 613 c.p.p.
Art. 616 c.p.p.
art. 616 cod. proc. pen
KI-generiert
Ordinanza — n. 28891/2023 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to failure to engage a qualified defense lawyer.
Ordinanza — n. 12587/2023 — snpen
Personal appeal by defendant without special bar counsel dismissed as inadmissible under Italian Criminal Procedure Code.
Ordinanza — n. 29261/2022 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible because the petitioner lacked standing to file the appeal personally.
Ordinanza — n. 22135/2026 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility due to lack of special bar association defense representation.
Ordinanza — n. 43163/2022 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to failure to be signed by a registered defense counsel.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

a seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: Saho Lamin nato in GAMBIA il 01/01/1987 avverso la sentenza del 28/01/2025 della Corte d'appello di Napoli Udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere Benedetto Paterno' Raddusa; letto il ricorso proposto Saho Lamin avverso la sentenza in epigrafe; esaminati gli atti e il provvedimento impugnato; ritenuto che il ricorso è inammissibile perché proposto personalmente dall'imputato 'non da un avvocato abilitato come imposto dal disposto di cui all'alt 613 cp rilevato che all'inammissibilità del ricorso, cui si procede de plano, conseguono le pronunce di cui all'art. 616 cod. proc. pen.

P.Q.M.

Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della cassa delle ammende. Così è deciso, 01/12/2025 Il Consigliere estensore Il Presidente BENEDETTO PATERNO' RADDUSA MARIA SILVIA GIORGI DEPOSITATA if CANU .190 2026